On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 00:14, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 7:56 PM Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 00:45, <luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 at 17:06, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:48 PM Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 15:48, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 10:25 AM <luca.boccassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > > > We are running a little short on devs/time in LSM land right now so I > > > > guess I'm the only real option (not that I have any time, but you know > > > > how it goes). If you can put together the ioctl side of things I can > > > > likely put together the LSM side fairly quickly - sound good? > > > > > > Here's a skeleton ioctl, needs lsm-specific fields to be added to the new struct, and filled in the new function: > > > > Forgot to mention, this is based on the vfs.pidfs branch of > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git > > Thanks. I'll take a closer look at this next week. In the meantime, > do you have this patch in a tree somewhere publicly fetchable? I've pushed it here: https://github.com/bluca/linux/tree/pidfd_ioctl_lsm