[PATCH 6.6 07/28] maple_tree: make mas_erase() more robust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit f7a59018953910032231c0a019208c4b0a4a8bc3 upstream.

mas_erase() may not deal correctly with all maple states.  Make the
function more robust by ensuring the state is in one of the two acceptable
states.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231101171629.3612299-3-Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 lib/maple_tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 9de2e3dfdfcc..e4d0df3980e0 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -6184,7 +6184,7 @@ void *mas_erase(struct ma_state *mas)
 	void *entry;
 	MA_WR_STATE(wr_mas, mas, NULL);
 
-	if (mas_is_none(mas) || mas_is_paused(mas))
+	if (!mas_is_active(mas) || !mas_is_start(mas))
 		mas->node = MAS_START;
 
 	/* Retry unnecessary when holding the write lock. */
-- 
2.39.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux