On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:49:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:06:38PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:39:10PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > > > The following changes since commit 5e3b72324d32629fa013f86657308f3dbc1115e1: > > > > > > bcachefs: Fix sysfs warning in fstests generic/730,731 (2024-10-14 05:43:01 -0400) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > https://github.com/koverstreet/bcachefs tags/bcachefs-2024-10-22 > > > > Hi Linus, > > > > There was a sub-thread on the linus-next discussion around improving > > telemetry around -next/lore w.r.t soaking time and mailing list reviews > > (https://lore.kernel.org/all/792F4759-EA33-48B8-9AD0-FA14FA69E86E@xxxxxxxxxx/). > > > > I've prototyped a set of scripts based on suggestions in the thread, and > > wanted to see if you'd find it useful. A great way to test it out is with > > a random pull request you'd review anyway :) > > > > Is the below useful in any way? Or do you already do something like this > > locally and I'm just wasting your time? > > > > If it's useful, is bot reply to PRs the best way to share this? Any > > other information that would be useful? > > As a maintainer I probably would've found this to be annoying, but with > all my other outside observer / participant hats on, I think it's very > good to have a bot to expose maintainers not following the process. That's the interesting about face... Personally, I'm curious what people are trying to achieve here.
