Re: [PATCH v3] vfs: new O_NODE open flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 05 Dec 2009, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I don't know what that means.  Do you mean that if:
> 
> root creates /dev/foo with 0666 perms
> eviluser opens /dev/foo with O_NODE

More precisely, O_NODE | O_NOACCESS

> root chmods /dev/foo to 0000
> root unlinks /dev/foo
> 
> then eviluser can't open /proc/self/fd/whatever for O_RDRW

Yes.

Maybe alan was worried about the O_NODE | O_RDWR, etc. case?  That
simply doesn't make any sense for special files.

Current patch only allows O_NOACCESS for any file type, but other
access modes may make sense for regular files, directories, and maybe
even symlinks.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux