Re: possible deadlock in freeze_super

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: brauner@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in freeze_super
From: Marius Fleischer <fleischermarius@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:29:42 -0700
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, harrisonmichaelgreen@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAJg=8jxMZ16pCEHTyv3Xr0dcHRYdwEZ6ZshXkQPYMXbNfkVTvg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Hope you are doing well!

Quick update from our side: The reproducers from the previous email
still trigger the deadlock on v5.15.167 (commit hash
3a5928702e7120f83f703fd566082bfb59f1a57e). Happy to also test on
other kernel versions if that helps.

Please let us know if there is any other helpful information we can provide.

Wishing you a nice day!

Best,
Marius

Follow-Ups:
- Re: possible deadlock in freeze_super
  - From: Dmitry Vyukov

References:
- possible deadlock in freeze_super
  - From: Marius Fleischer
- Re: possible deadlock in freeze_super
  - From: Christian Brauner
- Re: possible deadlock in freeze_super
  - From: Marius Fleischer

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fuse: remove tmp folio for writebacks and internal rb tree
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pidfd: extend pidfd_get_pid() and de-duplicate pid lookup
Previous by thread: Re: possible deadlock in freeze_super
Next by thread: Re: possible deadlock in freeze_super
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux