Re: [PATCH] rust: task: adjust safety comments in Task methods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On 10/15/24 8:24 PM, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 02:02:12PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > > The `Task` struct has several safety comments that aren't so great. For
> > > example, the reason that it's okay to read the `pid` is that the field
> > > is immutable, so there is no data race, which is not what the safety
> > > comment says.
> > > 
> > > Thus, improve the safety comments. Also add an `as_ptr` helper. This
> > > makes it easier to read the various accessors on Task, as `self.0` may
> > > be confusing syntax for new Rust users.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > This is based on top of vfs.rust.file as the file series adds some new
> > > task methods. Christian, can you take this through that tree?
> > > ---
> > >   rust/kernel/task.rs | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > >   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/task.rs b/rust/kernel/task.rs
> > > index 1a36a9f19368..080599075875 100644
> > > --- a/rust/kernel/task.rs
> > > +++ b/rust/kernel/task.rs
> > > @@ -145,11 +145,17 @@ fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
> > >           }
> > >       }
> > > +    /// Returns a raw pointer to the task.
> > > +    #[inline]
> > > +    pub fn as_ptr(&self) -> *mut bindings::task_struct {
> > 
> > FWIW, I think the name convention is `as_raw()` for a wrapper type of
> > `Opaque<T>` to return `*mut T`, e.g. `kernel::device::Device`.
> > 
> > Otherwise this looks good to me.
> Both names are in use. See e.g. Page and File that use as_ptr.
> 

`Page` is a different case because it currently is a pointer.

> In fact, I was asked to change the name on File *to* as_ptr.
> 

I'm not able to find the discussion on that ask. Appreciate it if you
can share a link.

Anyway, this is not important for now, and might not be in the future.
So:

Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Boqun

> Alice




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux