Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix regression in libfuse test_copy_file_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix regression in libfuse test_copy_file_range()
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:26:31 +0200
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, yangyun <yangyun50@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20241014192759.863031-1-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 21:28, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Miklos,
>
> I figured it was best to split the backing_file interface change from
> the fix, but both changes should be targetting stable.

Looks good.  Applied and pushed.

Thanks,
Miklos

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix regression in libfuse test_copy_file_range()
  - From: Amir Goldstein

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 19/30] arm64: add POE signal support
Next by Date: [RFC PATCH 0/6] initramfs: reduce buffer footprint
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 2/2] fuse: update inode size after extending passthrough write
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf] lib/buildid: handle memfd_secret() files in build_id_parse()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux