在 2024/10/10 19:31, David Howells 写道:
Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In cachefiles_daemon_secctx(), if it is detected that secctx has been
written to the cache, the error code returned is -EINVAL, which is
inappropriate and does not distinguish the situation well.
I disagree: it is an invalid parameter, not an already extant file, and a
message is logged for clarification. I'd prefer to avoid filesystem errors as
we are also doing filesystem operations.
David
Alright, what I originally intended was to differentiate the error codes
between cases where no arguments are specified and where cache->secctx
already exists.
Thanks,
Zizhi Wo
