On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 10:55:29PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > A lot of this patch and the previous one is similar to x86's and arm's. It great > that we can have consistency around this behavior. > There might be enough consistency to refactor some of the arch code into a > kernel/shstk.c. > Should we try? I think so - I think we discussed it before. I was thinking of looking at it once the clone3() stuff settles down, I don't want to trigger any unneeded refectorings there and cause further delays.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
