On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 10:20:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> xfs/046 - output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/046.out.bad)
> --- tests/xfs/046.out 2024-09-30 21:13:44.000000000 +0000
> +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/046.out.bad 2024-10-06 05:31:50.379495110 +0000
> @@ -34,4 +34,8 @@
> xfsrestore: restore complete: SECS seconds elapsed
> xfsrestore: Restore Status: SUCCESS
> Comparing listing of dump directory with restore directory
> +ls: /fs/scratch/dumpdir/sub/a-link: No such file or directory
> +ls: /fs/scratch/dumpdir/sub/b-link: No such file or directory
> +ls: /fs/scratch/restoredir/dumpdir/sub/a-link: No such file or directory
> +ls: /fs/scratch/restoredir/dumpdir/sub/b-link: No such file or directory
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/046.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/046.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
> Ran: xfs/046
> Failures: xfs/046
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
*stares*
D'oh... Inverted sense for AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW => LOOKUP_FLAGS...
Try this:
diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c
index 0b506b6565b7..b96cca3f4bf8 100644
--- a/fs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/xattr.c
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static int path_setxattrat(int dfd, const char __user *pathname,
if ((at_flags & ~(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH)) != 0)
return -EINVAL;
- if (at_flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)
+ if (!(at_flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW))
lookup_flags = LOOKUP_FOLLOW;
error = setxattr_copy(name, &ctx);
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static ssize_t path_getxattrat(int dfd, const char __user *pathname,
return file_getxattr(fd_file(f), &ctx);
} else {
int lookup_flags = 0;
- if (at_flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)
+ if (!(at_flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW))
lookup_flags = LOOKUP_FOLLOW;
return filename_getxattr(dfd, filename, lookup_flags, &ctx);
}
