On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 08:57:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Actually, it's not as bad as I thought it was going to be. I've > > already moved both fsnotify and LSM inode eviction to > > evict_inodes() as preparatory patches... > > Good, please Cc me and Günther on related patch series. > > FYI, we have the two release_inodes tests to check this hook in > tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c > > > > > Dave Chinner (2): > > vfs: move fsnotify inode eviction to evict_inodes() > > vfs, lsm: rework lsm inode eviction at unmount > > > > fs/inode.c | 52 +++++++++++++--- > > fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 60 ------------------- > > fs/super.c | 8 +-- > > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/security.h | 2 +- > > security/landlock/fs.c | 134 ++++++++++-------------------------------- Please run clang-format -i security/landlock/fs.c > > security/security.c | 31 ++++++---- > > 7 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-) > > > > -Dave. > > -- > > Dave Chinner > > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >
