[patch 1/4] nfs: remove unnecessary check from nfs_rename()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>

VFS already checks if both source and target are directories.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/dir.c |   10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/nfs/dir.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/nfs/dir.c	2009-12-02 13:46:12.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/nfs/dir.c	2009-12-02 15:10:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -1601,13 +1601,8 @@ static int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_
 	 * silly-rename. If the silly-rename succeeds, the
 	 * copied dentry is hashed and becomes the new target.
 	 */
-	if (!new_inode)
-		goto go_ahead;
-	if (S_ISDIR(new_inode->i_mode)) {
-		error = -EISDIR;
-		if (!S_ISDIR(old_inode->i_mode))
-			goto out;
-	} else if (atomic_read(&new_dentry->d_count) > 2) {
+	if (new_inode && !S_ISDIR(new_inode->i_mode) &&
+	    atomic_read(&new_dentry->d_count) > 2) {
 		int err;
 		/* copy the target dentry's name */
 		dentry = d_alloc(new_dentry->d_parent,
@@ -1627,7 +1622,6 @@ static int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-go_ahead:
 	/*
 	 * ... prune child dentries and writebacks if needed.
 	 */

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux