On 30/09/2024 13:54, John Garry wrote:
@@ -352,11 +352,15 @@ xfs_sb_has_compat_feature( #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_RMAPBT (1 << 1) /* reverse map btree */ #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_REFLINK (1 << 2) /* reflinked files */ #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT (1 << 3) /* inobt block counts */ +#define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ATOMICWRITES (1 << 31) /* atomicwrites enabled */ +
BTW, Darrick, as you questioned previously, this does make xfs/270 fail... until the change to a not use the top bit.
Thanks, John
