On Wed 02-10-24 21:00:03, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> __bdi_writeout_inc() has undergone multiple renamings, but the comment
> within the function body have not been updated accordingly. Update it
> to reflect the latest wb_domain_writeout_add().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Honza
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index a848e7f0719d..4f6efaa060bd 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static void wb_domain_writeout_add(struct wb_domain *dom,
> /* First event after period switching was turned off? */
> if (unlikely(!dom->period_time)) {
> /*
> - * We can race with other __bdi_writeout_inc calls here but
> + * We can race with other wb_domain_writeout_add calls here but
> * it does not cause any harm since the resulting time when
> * timer will fire and what is in writeout_period_time will be
> * roughly the same.
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
