Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] FDP and per-io hints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 10:18:41AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Have to say, that neither have your responses been. Can't really fault
> people for just giving up at some point, when no productive end seems to
> be in sight.

I heavily disagree and take offence on that.

The previous stream separation approach made total sense, but just
needed a fair amount of work.  But it closely matches how things work
at the hardware and file system level, so it was the right approach.

Suddenly dropping that and ignoring all comments really feels like
someone urgently needs to pull a marketing stunt here.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux