wt., 1 paź 2024 o 14:49 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
<regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> On 01.10.24 14:18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 01:29:09PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> >>> DIR* dir = opendir("/tmp/dirent-problems-test-dir");
> >>>
> >>> fd = creat("/tmp/dirent-problems-test-dir/after", 0644);
> >
> > "If a file is removed from or added to the directory after the most
> > recent call to opendir() or rewinddir(), whether a subsequent call to
> > readdir() returns an entry for that file is unspecified."
> >
> > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/readdir.html
> >
> > That said, if there's an easy fix here, it'd be a nice improvement to
> > QoI to do it, but the test-case as written is incorrect.
>
> Many thx Willy!
>
> Which leads to a question:
>
> Krzysztof, how did you find the problem? Was there a practical use case
> (some software or workload) with this behavior that broke and made your
> write that test-case? Or is that a test-program older and part of your
> CI tests or something like that?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
I have a unit test (
https://github.com/varqox/sim-project/blob/889bcee60af56fa28613aaf52d27f3dd2c32a079/subprojects/simlib/test/directory.cc
) in my project’s test suite where I create a temporary directory,
populate it with files and then list its contents using the handle
obtained during creation of the directory. And it started to list the
directory empty, since this patch was introduced.
While listing the temporary dir one is using is unlikely in this case,
we will see if any issue in other software will emerge after the 6.11
will be released as LTS kernel.
Thanks,
Krzysztof
