Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Theune <ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Daniel Dao <dqminh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:00:32 -0700
In-reply-to: <cldkpg3wtz2ovbyh53verlcauhqla7x2bi5ru4qo3kf4ehbiwz@ou56y3qjr5cv>
Mail-followup-to: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Theune <ct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Daniel Dao <dqminh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: NeoMutt/20240425

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:\n

Also, the last sentence in the description would need to be dropped.


No never mind this, it is fine. I was mostly thinking about the pathological
unbounded scenario which is removed, but after re-reading the description
it is still valid.

References:
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Christian Theune
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Christian Theune
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Christian Theune
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Christian Theune
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
  - From: Davidlohr Bueso

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs/writeback: convert wbc_account_cgroup_owner to take a folio
Next by Date: Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
Previous by thread: Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
Next by thread: Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]