Re: [PATCH 2/3] vfs: Fix implicit conversion problem when testing overflow case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2024年9月25日周三 16:37写道:
>
> Unrelated to the semantics but why do you use 2/3 numbering for a single
> patch? This is really confusing.

Sorry for the inconvenience. I used git send-email --to xxx --cc xxx
./*.patch to send my patch series. My intention was to send the three
patches together as a thread, but it clearly didn’t work out... I’ve
tried Google and ChatGPT but couldn’t find any information on how to
send a patch series as a single thread... The other two patches are
here[1][2], but they still need to be refined

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240920122621.215397-1-sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx/
[2]:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240920123022.215863-1-sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx/


Thanks,
-- 
Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux