Re: Report "WARNING in putname"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:50:17AM -0400, reveliofuzzing wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We found the following error when fuzzing^1 the Linux kernel 6.10 and
> we are able
> to reproduce it.

Must be nice, seeing that the rest of us are only given something
that needs syzbot (presumably with your modifications) to translate
into usable C.

[snip "dangling struct filename on return from mkdir()"]

> - reproducer
> syz_genetlink_get_family_id$mptcp(0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff)
> syz_open_dev$usbmon(&(0x7f00000004c0), 0x0, 0x0)
> setxattr$trusted_overlay_opaque(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
> socket$nl_generic(0x10, 0x3, 0x10)
> openat$null(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000001180), 0x0, 0x0)
> r0 = openat$urandom(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040), 0x0, 0x0)
> read(r0, &(0x7f0000000000), 0x2000)
> shutdown(0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0)
> r1 = syz_open_dev$sg(&(0x7f0000000040), 0x0, 0x0)

Seeing that nothing in that, as far as I can parse the damn language,
should go anywhere near mkdir(), I suspect that you are seeing
a memory corruption from something that reproducer is actually
doing.  And IIRC there had been a bunch of reports from you lately,
all with similar reproducers and with rather varied symptoms, which
makes memory corruptor triggering crap in whatever code that might
step on the buggered data structures afterwards.

Hard to tell anything beyond that without something one could
actually run...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux