Re: [RFC] exec: add a flag for "reasonable" execveat() comm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Subject: Re: [RFC] exec: add a flag for "reasonable" execveat() comm
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:44:51 +0300
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> #define AT_EXEC_REASONABLE_COMM 0x200

Please call this AT_ARGV0_COMM or something like that. "Reasonable" is quite
meaningless word by itself.

Prev by Date: Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] struct filename, io_uring and audit troubles
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] exec: add a flag for "reasonable" execveat() comm
Next by thread: Report "general protection fault in do_select"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux