On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 09:23:49PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > Add block size > page size to ramfs as we support minimum folio order > allocation in the page cache. The changes are very minimal, and this is > also a nice way to stress test just the page cache changes for minimum > folio order. I don't really see the point of upstreaming this. I'm sure it was useful for your testing. And splitting the patch in two makes no sense to me; the combined patch is not large. > Pankaj Raghav (2): > ramfs: add blocksize mount option > ramfs: enable block size > page size > > fs/ramfs/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
