On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 10:18, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Sept 2024 at 12:28, Kent Overstreet > <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We're now using an rhashtable instead of the system inode hash table; > > this is another significant performance improvement on multithreaded > > metadata workloads, eliminating more lock contention. > > So I've pulled this, but I reacted to this issue - what is the load > where the inode hash table is actually causing issues? Oh, and I also only now noticed that a third of the commits are fairly recent and from after the merge window even started. Maybe there's a good reason for that, but it sure wasn't explained in the pull request. Grr. Linus