On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 03:55:28PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > They were also merged into bpf-next/for-next so they can get early testing in > > linux-next. Umm... I see that stuff in bpf-next/struct_fd, but not in your for-next. > Can you guys please take a look and let us know if this looks sane and > fine to you? I kept Al's patches mostly intact (see my notes in the > cover letter above), and patch #3 does the refactoring I proposed > earlier, keeping explicit fdput() temporarily, until Al's > __bpf_map_get() refactoring which allows and nice and simple CLASS(fd) > conversion. > > I think we end up at exactly what the end goal of the original series > is: using CLASS(fd, ...) throughout with all the benefits. Looks sane.
