Re: [PATCH] timekeeping: move multigrain ctime floor handling into timekeeper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, at 19:55, John Stultz wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> index 5391e4167d60..56b979471c6a 100644

> My confusion comes from the fact it seems like that would mean you
> have to do all your timestamping with CLOCK_MONOTONIC (so you have a
> useful floor value that you're keeping), so I'm not sure I understand
> the utility of returning CLOCK_REALTIME values. I guess I don't quite
> see the logic where the floor value is updated here, so I'm guessing.

I think we could take this further and store the floor value
in the timekeeper itself rather than in a global variable
next to the caller.

And instead of storing the absolute floor value, it would
be enough to store the delta since the previous
update_wall_time(), which in turn can get updated by a
variant of ktime_get_real_ts64() and reset to zero during
update_wall_time().

That way the coarse function only gains a call to
timespec64_add_ns() over the traditional version, and the
fine-grained version needs to atomically update that value.
If the delta value has to be a 64-bit integer, there also
needs to be some serialization of the reader side, but I
think that can be done with read_seqcount_begin() .

      Arnd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux