Re: [PATCH 15/15] BKL: Update documentation on llseek()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:40:45 +0100
Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The inode's i_size is not protected by the big kernel lock. Therefore it
> does not make sense to recommend taking the BKL in filesystems llseek
> operations. Instead it should use the inode's mutex or use just use
> i_size_read() instead. Add a note that this is not protecting file->f_pos.

Looks good to me reading through it.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux