Re: [PATCH] procfs: make /proc style symlinks behave like "normal" symlinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 2009-11-20 10:31:40, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Adding the missing revalidations is fine, but I don't believe that
> > > helps to fix Pavel's issue. I'll go back and take a more careful look
> > > at the suggestion that Miklos made and see whether it makes sense to
> > > implement a new FS_* flag for this, and see what it'll take to fix
> > > Pavel's issue.
> 
> What is this "Pavel's issue"?

The one we were talking about, see bugtraq.

> > One posibility would be to make open(/proc/XX/fd/XX) behave like
> > dup(). That should solve the NFS problems, too, no?
> 
> You mean, reuse the old "struct file" for the new open?  Or what?

Aha, dup() results in file position being shared. You are right,
that's not going to fly :-(.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux