[PATCH] fs/pipe: Correct imprecise wording in comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The comment inaccurately describes what pipefs is - that is, a file
system.

Signed-off-by: Kienan Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi,

while reading through `pipe.c`, I noticed that the comment explaining
why pipefs should not be mounted in user space inaccurately describes
what pipefs is - that is, a file system.

While I understand the original language used in context, I believe
this change increases the legibility of the comment.

thanks,
kienan
---
 fs/pipe.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 7dff2aa50a6d..9a6dfe39f012 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static const struct super_operations pipefs_ops = {
 
 /*
  * pipefs should _never_ be mounted by userland - too much of security hassle,
- * no real gain from having the whole whorehouse mounted. So we don't need
+ * no real gain from having the whole file system mounted. So we don't need
  * any operations on the root directory. However, we need a non-trivial
  * d_name - pipe: will go nicely and kill the special-casing in procfs.
  */

---
base-commit: d5d547aa7b51467b15d9caa86b116f8c2507c72a
change-id: 20240829-pipe-correct_imprecise_wording-d20e370edbc0

Best regards,
-- 
Kienan Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux