Re: [PATCH v2 -next 00/15] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:29:56AM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote:
> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to
> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups.
> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its
> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table.
> 
> All the modifications of this patch series base on
> linux-next(tags/next-20240902). To test this patch series, the code was
> compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and
> x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files
> under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally.

This move make a lot of sense. The question with these multi-subsystem
patchsets is how do they go into mainline. For now I have added this to
sysctl-testing to see if it needs more work. I can push this through the
sysctl subsystem, but you need to get reviewed-by for all of the commits
in different subsystems. I'm also fine with this going in through some
other subsys if anyone wants to take it?

Best

-- 

Joel Granados




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux