Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Write-placement hints and FDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Amir,


On 8/26/2024 10:36 PM, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> Current write-hint infrastructure supports 6 temperature-based data life
> hints.
> The series extends the infrastructure with a new temperature-agnostic
> placement-type hint. New fcntl codes F_{SET/GET}_RW_HINT_EX allow to
> send the hint type/value on file. See patch #3 commit description for
> the details.
> 
> Overall this creates 128 placement hint values [*] that users can pass.
> Patch #5 adds the ability to map these new hint values to nvme-specific
> placement-identifiers.
> Patch #4 restricts SCSI to use only life hint values.
> Patch #1 and #2 are simple prep patches.
> 
> [*] While the user-interface can support more, this limit is due to the
> in-kernel plumbing consideration of the inode size. Pahole showed 32-bit
> hole in the inode, but the code had this comment too:
> 
> /* 32-bit hole reserved for expanding i_fsnotify_mask */
> 
> Not must, but it will be good to know if a byte (or two) can be used
> here.

Since having one extra byte will simplify things, I can't help but ask - 
do you still have the plans to use this space (in entirety) within inode?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux