On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 11:01:50PM -0400, imandevel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Iman Seyed <ImanDevel@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Avoid setting ret to -EAGAIN unnecessarily. Only set
> it when O_NONBLOCK is specified; otherwise, leave ret
> unchanged and proceed to set it to -ERESTARTSYS.
>
Hi Iman,
Have you checked the code generated by gcc before and after applying
this patch? My intuition suggests that the compiler optimization might
result in the same code being produced.
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
> Signed-off-by: Iman Seyed <ImanDevel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> index 4ffc30606e0b..d5d4b306a33d 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> @@ -279,9 +279,11 @@ static ssize_t inotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> continue;
> }
>
> - ret = -EAGAIN;
> - if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> + if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> break;
> + }
> +
> ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> if (signal_pending(current))
> break;
> --
> 2.46.0
>
