Re: [PATCH 12/12] bdi: use bdi_stat_sum() for more accurate debugfs stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 16:27 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> plain text document attachment (bdi-debug-dump-sum.patch)
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/backing-dev.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux.orig/mm/backing-dev.c	2009-11-18 16:25:28.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/mm/backing-dev.c	2009-11-18 16:26:10.000000000 +0800
> @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ static int bdi_debug_stats_show(struct s
>  		   "wb_mask:          %8lx\n"
>  		   "wb_list:          %8u\n"
>  		   "wb_cnt:           %8u\n",
> -		   (unsigned long) K(bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK)),
> -		   (unsigned long) K(bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE)),
> +		   (unsigned long) K(bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK)),
> +		   (unsigned long) K(bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE)),
>  		   K(bdi_thresh), K(dirty_thresh),
>  		   K(background_thresh), nr_wb, nr_dirty, nr_io, nr_more_io,
>  		   !list_empty(&bdi->bdi_list), bdi->state, bdi->wb_mask,
> 

Is this really important? This patch is basically a local DoS for large
machines.

Imagine someone doing:

while :; do cat /debug/bdi/*/stats; done

on a 512 cpu box.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux