Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: Switch to memalloc_flags_do() for vmalloc allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:19:13AM GMT, Michal Hocko wrote:
> GFP_NOWAIT is explicitly documented as unsupported
> (__vmalloc_node_range_noprof). vmalloc internals are using
> vmap_purge_lock and blocking notifiers (vmap_notify_list) in rare cases
> so PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM is not really sufficient to provide NOWAIT
> semantic (this is really not just about page tables allocations). There
> might be other places that require blocking - I do not claim to be an
> expert on the vmalloc allocator.

Sure, but those are easily fixed, if necessary. We'd also want to be
explicit on whether NORECLAIM needs to be NOWAIT or just NORECLAIM -
those are slightly different things.

As long as it's NORECLAIM that should be fine - it's really only an
issue if we need to map GFP_NOWAIT to PF_MEMALLOC_*.

> It seems that this discussion is not going to be really productive so I
> will leave you here.

I think you'll find these discussions become much more productive when
you're able to stick to the technical, and when you yourself are able to
listen to counterarguments. I remind you that we hash things out here on
the list; we don't resort to things like "this has been decided" or "the
mm community says"; you need to be properly justifying what you want to
do here.

And if people aren't listening to your arguments, that should be a hint
to you that maybe you aren't making good ones.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux