libaokun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
> but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
> deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:
>
> ==================================================================
> remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
> WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
> Modules linked in: netfs(-)
> CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 #860
> RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
> __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
> do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> ==================================================================
>
> Therefore use remove_proc_subtree instead() of remove_proc_entry() to
> fix the above problem.
>
> Fixes: 7eb5b3e3a0a5 ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Should remove_proc_entry() just remove the entire subtree anyway?
But you can add:
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
David
