Re: [PATCH 0/13] sysfs lazification.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 03:53:56AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> The sysfs code updates the vfs caches immediately when the sysfs data
>> structures change causing a lot of unnecessary complications.  The
>> following patchset untangles that beast.  Allowing for simpler
>> more straight forward code, the removal of a hack from the vfs
>> to support sysfs, and human comprehensible locking on sysfs.
>> 
>> Most of these patches have already been reviewed and acked from the
>> last time I had time to work on sysfs.
>> 
>> In net the patches look like:
>
> Can you resend these based on the review that you just got, with the new
> acks and changes so that I can apply them?

Are you going to apply them soon?  If you don't have time I can start
a sysfs tree and just ask Linus to pull them.

Eric



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux