Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/08/2024 21:38, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
This (atomicwrites && !forcealign) ought to be checked in the superblock
verifier.
You mean in xfs_fs_validate_params(), right?
xfs_validate_sb_common, where we do all the other ondisk superblock
validation.

I don't see any other xfs_has_XXX checks in xfs_validate_sb_common(), but this could be the first...

The only other place in which I see a pattern of similar SB feature flag checks is in xfs_finish_flags() for checking xfs_has_crc() && xfs_has_noattr2().

So if we go with xfs_validate_sb_common(), then should the check in xfs_fs_fill_super() for xfs_has_forcealign() && xfs_has_realtime()/reflink() be relocated to xfs_validate_sb_common() also:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240813163638.3751939-8-john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx/

Cheers,
John




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux