On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 02:15:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> +static void noinstr el0_gcs(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
> +{
> + enter_from_user_mode(regs);
> + local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX);
> + do_el0_gcs(regs, esr);
> + exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> +}
> +
> static void noinstr el0_inv(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
> {
> enter_from_user_mode(regs);
> @@ -766,6 +786,9 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr el0t_64_sync_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> case ESR_ELx_EC_MOPS:
> el0_mops(regs, esr);
> break;
> + case ESR_ELx_EC_GCS:
> + el0_gcs(regs, esr);
> + break;
> case ESR_ELx_EC_BREAKPT_LOW:
> case ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW:
> case ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_LOW:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 9e22683aa921..d410dcc12ed8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,16 @@ void do_el1_bti(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
> die("Oops - BTI", regs, esr);
> }
>
> +void do_el0_gcs(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
> +{
> + force_signal_inject(SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR, regs->pc, 0);
> +}
Just double checking: a GCSPOPM (for example, it can be a RET) from a
non-GCS page would generate a classic permission fault with ISS2.GCS set
rather than a GCS exception. That's my reading from the Arm ARM
pseudocode, the text isn't clear to me.
--
Catalin
