On Sat, 2024-08-10 at 14:24 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 17:22 +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > part three
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/fuse/file.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> > index 2b5533e41a62..f39456c65ed7 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> > @@ -937,9 +937,7 @@ static void fuse_readpages_end(struct
> > fuse_mount
> > *fm, struct fuse_args *args,
> > for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) {
> > struct folio *folio = page_folio(ap->pages[i]);
> >
> > - if (!err)
> > - folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> > - folio_unlock(folio);
> > + folio_end_read(folio, !err);
> > folio_put(folio);
> > }
> > if (ia->ff)
>
> Reverting this part is sufficient to fix the issue for me.
Would it make sense to get a revert of this part (or a full revert of
commit 413e8f014c8b) into mainline and also 6.10 stable if a proper fix
will take more time?
Cheers,
Jürg
