On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 2:03 AM Matteo Croce <technoboy85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@xxxxxxxx> > > Pass to register_btf_kfunc_id_set() a btf_kfunc_hook directly, instead > of a bpf_prog_type. > Many program types share the same kfunc hook, so some calls to > register_btf_kfunc_id_set() can be removed. > > Tested compiling the kernel with -Werror=enum-conversion to catch all > the occourrences. > > Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@xxxxxxxx> I think it's too soon to do this kind of cleanup. We need to refactor this logic to accommodate sched-ext allow/deny pattern for kfunc per struct-ops hook. Let's keep this code as-is for now. pw-bot: cr
