Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] mm/util: Fix possible race condition in kstrdup()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Yafang,

On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 10:56:21AM GMT, Yafang Shao wrote:
> In kstrdup(), it is critical to ensure that the dest string is always
> NUL-terminated. However, potential race condidtion can occur between a
> writer and a reader.
> 
> Consider the following scenario involving task->comm:
> 
>     reader                    writer
> 
>   len = strlen(s) + 1;
>                              strlcpy(tsk->comm, buf, sizeof(tsk->comm));
>   memcpy(buf, s, len);
> 
> In this case, there is a race condition between the reader and the
> writer. The reader calculate the length of the string `s` based on the
> old value of task->comm. However, during the memcpy(), the string `s`
> might be updated by the writer to a new value of task->comm.
> 
> If the new task->comm is larger than the old one, the `buf` might not be
> NUL-terminated. This can lead to undefined behavior and potential
> security vulnerabilities.
> 
> Let's fix it by explicitly adding a NUL-terminator.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/util.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 983baf2bd675..4542d8a800d9 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -62,8 +62,14 @@ char *kstrdup(const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
>  
>  	len = strlen(s) + 1;
>  	buf = kmalloc_track_caller(len, gfp);
> -	if (buf)
> +	if (buf) {
>  		memcpy(buf, s, len);
> +		/* During memcpy(), the string might be updated to a new value,
> +		 * which could be longer than the string when strlen() is
> +		 * called. Therefore, we need to add a null termimator.
> +		 */
> +		buf[len - 1] = '\0';
> +	}

I would compact the above to:

	len = strlen(s);
	buf = kmalloc_track_caller(len + 1, gfp);
	if (buf)
		strcpy(mempcpy(buf, s, len), "");

It allows _FORTIFY_SOURCE to track the copy of the NUL, and also uses
less screen.  It also has less moving parts.  (You'd need to write a
mempcpy() for the kernel, but that's as easy as the following:)

	#define mempcpy(d, s, n)  (memcpy(d, s, n) + n)

In shadow utils, I did a global replacement of all buf[...] = '\0'; by
strcpy(..., "");.  It ends up being optimized by the compiler to the
same code (at least in the experiments I did).


Have a lovely day!
Alex

>  	return buf;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kstrdup);
> -- 
> 2.43.5
> 

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux