Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] iomap: correct the dirty length in page mkwrite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/8/15 13:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:49:41PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> Sorry, this makes me confused. How does this could prevent setting
>> redundant dirty bits?
>>
>> Suppose we have a 3K regular file on a filesystem with 1K block size.
>> In iomap_page_mkwrite(), the iter.len is 3K, if the folio size is 4K,
>> folio_mark_dirty() will also mark all 4 bits of ifs dirty. And then,
>> if we expand this file size to 4K, and this will still lead to a hole
>> with dirty bit set but without any block allocated/reserved. Am I
>> missing something?
> 
> No, we still need the ifs manipulation in the loop indeed.  But
> the filemap_dirty_folio (and the not uptodate warning) can still
> move outside the iterator.
> 
Yes, right, I misunderstood.

Thanks,
Yi.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux