On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 1:27 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > There are already memalloc_noreclaim_{save,restore} which imply __GFP_MEMALLOC:
> >
> > memalloc_noreclaim_save - Marks implicit __GFP_MEMALLOC scope.
>
> .. and those are horrible misnamed :(
What about renaming it to memalloc_memalloc_save ?
>
> If we can't even keep our APIs consistently name, who is supposed
> to understand all this?
>
--
Regards
Yafang
