On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 04:50:06PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:01:09PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > There are situations where fuse servers can become unresponsive or take
> > too long to reply to a request. Currently there is no upper bound on
> > how long a request may take, which may be frustrating to users who get
> > stuck waiting for a request to complete.
> >
> > This commit adds a timeout option (in seconds) for requests. If the
> > timeout elapses before the server replies to the request, the request
> > will fail with -ETIME.
> >
> > There are 3 possibilities for a request that times out:
> > a) The request times out before the request has been sent to userspace
> > b) The request times out after the request has been sent to userspace
> > and before it receives a reply from the server
> > c) The request times out after the request has been sent to userspace
> > and the server replies while the kernel is timing out the request
> >
> > While a request timeout is being handled, there may be other handlers
> > running at the same time if:
> > a) the kernel is forwarding the request to the server
> > b) the kernel is processing the server's reply to the request
> > c) the request is being re-sent
> > d) the connection is aborting
> > e) the device is getting released
> >
> > Proper synchronization must be added to ensure that the request is
> > handled correctly in all of these cases. To this effect, there is a new
> > FR_FINISHING bit added to the request flags, which is set atomically by
> > either the timeout handler (see fuse_request_timeout()) which is invoked
> > after the request timeout elapses or set by the request reply handler
> > (see dev_do_write()), whichever gets there first. If the reply handler
> > and the timeout handler are executing simultaneously and the reply handler
> > sets FR_FINISHING before the timeout handler, then the request will be
> > handled as if the timeout did not elapse. If the timeout handler sets
> > FR_FINISHING before the reply handler, then the request will fail with
> > -ETIME and the request will be cleaned up.
> >
> > Currently, this is the refcount lifecycle of a request:
> >
> > Synchronous request is created:
> > fuse_simple_request -> allocates request, sets refcount to 1
> > __fuse_request_send -> acquires refcount
> > queues request and waits for reply...
> > fuse_simple_request -> drops refcount
> >
> > Background request is created:
> > fuse_simple_background -> allocates request, sets refcount to 1
> >
> > Request is replied to:
> > fuse_dev_do_write
> > fuse_request_end -> drops refcount on request
> >
> > Proper acquires on the request reference must be added to ensure that the
> > timeout handler does not drop the last refcount on the request while
> > other handlers may be operating on the request. Please note that the
> > timeout handler may get invoked at any phase of the request's
> > lifetime (eg before the request has been forwarded to userspace, etc).
> >
> > It is always guaranteed that there is a refcount on the request when the
> > timeout handler is executing. The timeout handler will be either
> > deactivated by the reply/abort/release handlers, or if the timeout
> > handler is concurrently executing on another CPU, the reply/abort/release
> > handlers will wait for the timeout handler to finish executing first before
> > it drops the final refcount on the request.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/fuse/dev.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 14 ++++
> > fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 ++
> > 3 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > index 9eb191b5c4de..bcb9ff2156c0 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("devname:fuse");
> >
> > static struct kmem_cache *fuse_req_cachep;
> >
> > +static void fuse_request_timeout(struct timer_list *timer);
> > +
> > static struct fuse_dev *fuse_get_dev(struct file *file)
> > {
> > /*
> > @@ -48,6 +50,8 @@ static void fuse_request_init(struct fuse_mount *fm, struct fuse_req *req)
> > refcount_set(&req->count, 1);
> > __set_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
> > req->fm = fm;
> > + if (fm->fc->req_timeout)
> > + timer_setup(&req->timer, fuse_request_timeout, 0);
> > }
> >
> > static struct fuse_req *fuse_request_alloc(struct fuse_mount *fm, gfp_t flags)
> > @@ -277,7 +281,7 @@ static void flush_bg_queue(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> > * the 'end' callback is called if given, else the reference to the
> > * request is released
> > */
> > -void fuse_request_end(struct fuse_req *req)
> > +static void do_fuse_request_end(struct fuse_req *req)
> > {
> > struct fuse_mount *fm = req->fm;
> > struct fuse_conn *fc = fm->fc;
> > @@ -296,8 +300,6 @@ void fuse_request_end(struct fuse_req *req)
> > list_del_init(&req->intr_entry);
> > spin_unlock(&fiq->lock);
> > }
> > - WARN_ON(test_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags));
> > - WARN_ON(test_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags));
> > if (test_bit(FR_BACKGROUND, &req->flags)) {
> > spin_lock(&fc->bg_lock);
> > clear_bit(FR_BACKGROUND, &req->flags);
> > @@ -329,8 +331,104 @@ void fuse_request_end(struct fuse_req *req)
> > put_request:
> > fuse_put_request(req);
> > }
> > +
> > +void fuse_request_end(struct fuse_req *req)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON(test_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags));
> > + WARN_ON(test_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags));
> > +
> > + if (req->timer.function)
> > + timer_delete_sync(&req->timer);
>
> This becomes just timer_delete_sync();
>
Err ignore this, I had another comment about always initializing the timer, but
I realized why you're doing what you're doing and so this isn't relevant.
Thanks,
Josef
