On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 03:27:18PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> xfs has it's own handling for write faults, so we need to add the
> pre-content fsnotify hook for this case. Reads go through filemap_fault
> so they're handled properly there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 4cdc54dc9686..585a8c2eea0f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1325,14 +1325,28 @@ __xfs_filemap_fault(
> bool write_fault)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> + struct file *fpin = NULL;
> + vm_fault_t ret;
>
> trace_xfs_filemap_fault(XFS_I(inode), order, write_fault);
>
> - if (write_fault)
> - return xfs_write_fault(vmf, order);
> if (IS_DAX(inode))
> return xfs_dax_read_fault(vmf, order);
> - return filemap_fault(vmf);
> +
> + if (!write_fault)
> + return filemap_fault(vmf);
Doesn't this break DAX read faults? i.e. they have to go through
xfs_dax_read_fault(), not filemap_fault().
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
