Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 12:51:36 +0200
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240730050927.GC5334@ZenIV>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 06:09:27AM GMT, Al Viro wrote:
> 		Background
> 		==========

That series looks good and pretty simple to me. There was nothing really
suprising in that code.

References:
- [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 39/39] deal with the last remaing boolean uses of fd_file()
Next by Date: [PATCH net-next] eventpoll: Don't re-zero eventpoll fields
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
Next by thread: [PATCHSET v3] struct fd and memory safety
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux