Re: [PATCH v3 09/14] xfs: Update xfs_setattr_size() for forcealign

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 04:30:52PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> For when an inode has forcealign, reserve blocks for same reason which we
> were doing for big RT alloc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index 1cdc8034f54d..6e017aa6f61d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -926,12 +926,12 @@ xfs_setattr_size(
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * For realtime inode with more than one block rtextsize, we need the
> +	 * For inodes with more than one block alloc unitsize, we need the
>  	 * block reservation for bmap btree block allocations/splits that can
>  	 * happen since it could split the tail written extent and convert the
>  	 * right beyond EOF one to unwritten.
>  	 */
> -	if (xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(ip))
> +	if (xfs_inode_alloc_fsbsize(ip) > 1)
>  		resblks = XFS_DIOSTRAT_SPACE_RES(mp, 0);
>  
>  	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, resblks,
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux