Re: [PATCH resend v4 00/11] Improve the copy of task comm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v4 00/11] Improve the copy of task comm
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:59:27 -0700
Cc: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-trace-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, audit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240729023719.1933-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:37:08 +0800 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is it appropriate for you to apply this to the mm tree?

There are a couple of minor conflicts against current 6.11-rc1 which
you'd best check.  So please redo this against current mainline?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH resend v4 00/11] Improve the copy of task comm
  - From: Yafang Shao

References:
- [PATCH resend v4 00/11] Improve the copy of task comm
  - From: Yafang Shao

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fuse: add timeout option for requests
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH resend v4 00/11] Improve the copy of task comm
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH resend v4 00/11] Improve the copy of task comm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux