Re: posix_fallocate behavior in glibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-07-29 09:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

How can we get rid of this glibc fallback that turns the implementations
non-conformant and increases write amplication for no good reason?

The simplest solution would be to remove the broken fallback in glibc. A more conservative possibility would be to use the fallback only on file system types that lack native fallocate and where the fallback is known to work (which are they?). Perhaps you could propose a patch along either line.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux