Re: Testing if two open descriptors refer to the same inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 08:55:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It was pointed out to me that inode numbers on Linux are no longer
> expected to be unique per file system, even for local file systems.

I don't know if I'm parsing this correctly.

Are you claiming on-disk inode numbers are not guaranteed unique per
filesystem? It sounds like utter breakage, with capital 'f'.

I know the 32-bit inode allocation code can result in unintentional
duplicates after wrap around (see get_next_ino), but that's for
in-memory stuff only(?) like pipes, so perhaps tolerable.

Anyhow, the kernel recently got F_DUPFD_QUERY which tests if the *file*
object is the same.

While the above is not what's needed here, I guess it sets a precedent
for F_DUPINODE_QUERY (or whatever other name) to be added to handily
compare inode pointers. It may be worthwhile regardless of the above.
(or maybe kcmp could be extended?)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux