Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: add negative tests for new VFS based BPF kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:56 AM Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add a bunch of negative selftests responsible for asserting that the
> BPF verifier successfully rejects a BPF program load when the
> underlying BPF program misuses one of the newly introduced VFS based
> BPF kfuncs.

Negative tests are great. Thanks for adding them.

A few nitpicks below.

[...]

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> index 828556cdc2f0..8a1ed62b4ed1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,32 @@ extern void bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it) __ksym;
>   */
>  extern void bpf_throw(u64 cookie) __ksym;
>
> +/* Description
> + *     Acquire a reference on the exe_file member field belonging to the
> + *     mm_struct that is nested within the supplied task_struct. The supplied
> + *     task_struct must be trusted/referenced.
> + * Returns
> + *     A referenced file pointer pointing to the exe_file member field of the
> + *     mm_struct nested in the supplied task_struct, or NULL.
> + */
> +extern struct file *bpf_get_task_exe_file(struct task_struct *task) __ksym;
> +
> +/* Description
> + *     Release a reference on the supplied file. The supplied file must be
> + *     trusted/referenced.

Probably replace "trusted/referenced" with "acquired".

> + */
> +extern void bpf_put_file(struct file *file) __ksym;
> +
> +/* Description
> + *     Resolve a pathname for the supplied path and store it in the supplied
> + *     buffer. The supplied path must be trusted/referenced.
> + * Returns
> + *     A positive integer corresponding to the length of the resolved pathname,
> + *     including the NULL termination character, stored in the supplied
> + *     buffer. On error, a negative integer is returned.
> + */
> +extern int bpf_path_d_path(struct path *path, char *buf, size_t buf__sz) __ksym;
> +

In my environment, we already have these declarations in vmlinux.h.
So maybe we don't need to add them manually?


>  /* This macro must be used to mark the exception callback corresponding to the
>   * main program. For example:
>   *
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
> index 67a49d12472c..14d74ba2188e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
>  #include "verifier_value_or_null.skel.h"
>  #include "verifier_value_ptr_arith.skel.h"
>  #include "verifier_var_off.skel.h"
> +#include "verifier_vfs_reject.skel.h"
>  #include "verifier_xadd.skel.h"
>  #include "verifier_xdp.skel.h"
>  #include "verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access.skel.h"
> @@ -205,6 +206,7 @@ void test_verifier_value(void)                { RUN(verifier_value); }
>  void test_verifier_value_illegal_alu(void)    { RUN(verifier_value_illegal_alu); }
>  void test_verifier_value_or_null(void)        { RUN(verifier_value_or_null); }
>  void test_verifier_var_off(void)              { RUN(verifier_var_off); }
> +void test_verifier_vfs_reject(void)          { RUN(verifier_vfs_reject); }
>  void test_verifier_xadd(void)                 { RUN(verifier_xadd); }
>  void test_verifier_xdp(void)                  { RUN(verifier_xdp); }
>  void test_verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access); }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_vfs_reject.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_vfs_reject.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..27666a8ef78a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_vfs_reject.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Google LLC. */
> +
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include <linux/limits.h>
> +
> +#include "bpf_misc.h"
> +#include "bpf_experimental.h"
> +
> +static char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +
> +SEC("lsm.s/file_open")
> +__failure __msg("Possibly NULL pointer passed to trusted arg0")
> +int BPF_PROG(get_task_exe_file_kfunc_null)
> +{
> +       struct file *acquired;
> +
> +       /* Can't pass a NULL pointer to bpf_get_task_exe_file(). */
> +       acquired = bpf_get_task_exe_file(NULL);
> +       if (!acquired)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       bpf_put_file(acquired);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("lsm.s/inode_getxattr")
> +__failure __msg("arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point to scalar, or struct with scalar")
> +int BPF_PROG(get_task_exe_file_kfunc_fp)
> +{
> +       u64 x;
> +       struct file *acquired;
> +       struct task_struct *fp;

"fp" is a weird name for a task_struct pointer.

Other than these:

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>

> +
> +       fp = (struct task_struct *)&x;
> +       /* Can't pass random frame pointer to bpf_get_task_exe_file(). */
> +       acquired = bpf_get_task_exe_file(fp);
> +       if (!acquired)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       bpf_put_file(acquired);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux