Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/3] introduce new VFS based BPF kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 03:22:09PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:56:01AM GMT, Matt Bobrowski wrote:
> > G'day!
> > 
> > The original cover letter providing background context and motivating
> > factors around the needs for these new VFS related BPF kfuncs
> > introduced within this patch series can be found here [0]. Please do
> > reference that if needed.
> > 
> > The changes contained within this version of the patch series mainly
> > came at the back of discussions held with Christian at LSFMMBPF
> > recently. In summary, the primary difference within this patch series
> > when compared to the last [1] is that I've reduced the number of VFS
> > related BPF kfuncs being introduced, housed them under fs/, and added
> > more selftests.
> 
> I have no complaints about this now that it's been boiled down.
> So as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to pick this up. (I also wouldn't
> mind follow-up patches that move the xattr bpf kfuncs under fs/ as
> well.)

Wonderful, thank you Christian!

I agree, those should also reside in alongside these newly added BPF
kfuncs. I'll send through a patch addressing this
separately. Generally, I think the same applies for any other VFS
related BPF kfuncs that end up getting introduced moving forward.

/M




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux